Aug 3, 2010 0
What is your brand’s Social Voice?
If you work in advertising or any role where you are consulting with companies about some aspect of their ongoing relationship with customers — you may have come across the challenge of figuring out your client’s “Social Voice”. Essentially it is the same thing as a brand voice & it refers to the type of personality and communication style your client’s brand has when engaging with customers.
You might think that Social Voice is a totally new thing attributed to the recent impact of social media, but that would be incorrect. Successful brands have had a social voice for as long as there have been companies that sell goods and services to customers. What social media has done, is shift the power to the customer and as a result the spotlight is now beaming down on a brand’s ability to engage with customers as a key success metric these days.
Initially most people who think about brand strategy all day thought that Social Voice should be some type of straight personification of the brand. “If my brand were a person what type of person would he/she be …fun, serious, quirky, brash? What does a quirky person talk like anyway? Why would someone want to be friends with my brand?”. I think this is the right direction, but this approach is not applicable for ALL brands. I think this type of social voice works well for companies that have a strong and highly visible individual that regularly represents the brand — a CEO or primary spokesperson that is front and center in all marketing efforts or perhaps a small business where the owner IS the brand. In these cases, I think having a single social voice that comes from the person at the center of the brand is the right way to go. Clearly this person who represents your brand has an engaging personality that people like and think of when they think of your company (or you have bigger problems) so thier voice is the right social voice.
For the majority of companies, however, I do not think a single prescribed social voice is the right approach. Most companies do not have a single person or spokesperson that exclusively represents the brand to the world. In most situations, a company’s brand is represented by the hundreds or thousands of employees that engage with the customers on a daily basis. In fact, even with companies that have a strong individual representative …the employees still are the most important aspect of the company delivering on it’s promises. These employees ARE the brand. In these cases, a single prescribed social voice would come off as totally fake and customers would punish the company for that.
(Imagine having a casual conversation with someone at a party …but whenever they spoke they were reading from a script. Fun party.)
When the employees ARE the brand, the best approach for developing a social voice is to make sure the employees can be themselves. I am not proposing a free-for-all with no brand direction, but rather a loose range that allows individual personalities to shine within. I think the approach to develop this type of social voice range for a brand includes the following steps:
- Do the whole brand personification exercise and figure out what type of person your brand is & how they would act/ talk/ behave
- Once you have that single voice for your brand consider that your center point
- Take the center point as the bulls-eye and establish an acceptable range of personality types and behavior that circles around it
- Look for employees that have personalities that authentically live within this acceptable range
- Let them be themselves, and directly represent the brand with their own style
This approach is definitely described at a high level, but I think it covers the main steps that should be taken to figure out what type of social voice range would be successful for a brand. At the end of the day, people do not want to be talked to with no opportunity for two-way dialogue …nor do they want to hold a conversation with a person who clearly is faking it and not being themselves. So, it is better to let the people that work directly with the customers be themselves than to give them scripts or worse to muzzle them.
What other approaches for brand voice and social voice do you know of?








